Capturing Jurors' Attention With Trial Exhibits

1000 grains of sand or one shining piece of sea glass?you hire a professional, you will get the most bang for
What would capture your attention when standing onyour buck by expecting that professional to take your
the beach? This is the challenge of preparing exhibitsideas, refine them and make them better.
for trial. You need the sand for the foundation of yourDon't spend the big bucks unless you know the exhibit
case, but you also need that shining sea glass - thatwill help you not hurt you:
key exhibit that will you help seal the deal. ManyLet's take animation as an example because this is the
lawyers try cases that fill up boxes and boxes withone type of trial exhibit that can literally cost thousands
documents. As a trial consultant, I help plaintiff andand thousands of dollars. Some cases naturally lend
defense lawyers sift through their cases and testthemselves to animation but creating a costly
them out well before trial with focus groups and mockanimation without knowing how it will impact jurors can
trials. Through this work, I've learned the following thingsbe a big mistake. For example, in a case involving
about trial exhibits:allegations that a police officer used excessive force
Winning exhibits shout out key themes and leaveby shooting the driver of a car, an animation was
jurors with a clear conclusion about your case.created by a plaintiff's attorney. The plaintiff's attorney
Sometimes the winning exhibit is just a piece of paper,spent his own money because he thought the
to which nothing more is done except enlarging it foranimation would clearly depict that the police officer
trial. For example, in the process of preparing a focuswas not in danger and shooting the driver was
group for a plaintiff's employment lawyer, I cameunreasonable. The lawyer made that same point with
across a document where the supervisor catalogueda diagram, showing that the police officer was off to
the plaintiff's shortcomings in an email. I asked my client,an angle so that even if he stood still, the car would
"Why aren't we using this?" My client said, "oh, THAT. Ihave missed him, and that he could have gotten out of
am going to file a motion in limine to try to keep thatthe way. But the lawyer wanted this diagram to come
out of evidence." He felt this document was tooto life, which is where the animation came into play.
damaging to his client and felt the case would fareBy the time the lawyer conducted the mock trial, he
better without it. Since the whole point of a focushad paid for all but the final tweaks on his prized piece
group is to test out all key aspects of a case, Iof technology. When the animation was presented to
suggested that we include it, just to see what wouldmock jurors, they reacted opposite of what this
happen.attorney expected: By making the scene come alive,
The mock jurors reviewed many documents at thejurors were suddenly standing in the police officer's
focus group including this one. Lo and behold, not onlyshoes, with a moving car coming towards them. Now,
did this document matter, but it was pivotal: Jurors readthe simple math of calculating an angle, which would
it and came to the unanimous conclusion that thehave shown the officer was off to one side, was
supervisor was out to get the plaintiff; it was theirrelevant. Instead, jurors saw a police officer in close
smoking gun, proving discriminatory motive. Why? Forproximity to a vehicle that was quickly moving closer
one simple reason: The email was written afterand closer.
midnight. Jurors noticed this immediately and deemed itUpon learning that his animation actually hurt his case,
proof-positive of pretext. During their discussions, mockthe lawyer did the smart thing and decided not to use
jurors jeered at the notion that a supervisor could beit and he was able to win his case. It is interesting to
legitimately motivated to write a "counseling memo" inconsider what would have happened if the defense
the wee hours after midnight. The plaintiff found hishad used the animation instead? The animation would
shining piece of sea glass and it happened to be ahave depicted the police officer's location with a car
small but critical detail on one piece of paper.moving towards him. The plaintiff knew that this was
Always, always, always use a time-line.exactly what jurors needed to stand in the police
No matter what the case, the subject matter, theofficer's shoes but the defense lawyers had no idea.
simplicity or the complexity, you should always use aThe point is that when one side is working hard to
time-line. If I had $100 for every lawyer who called medevelop and test out effective exhibits, the other side
on the eve of trial without a time line, I'd be one moremay be asleep at the switch.
consultant using tired old clichés but I'd also beDon't be afraid to be your non-technological self
rich! And for every time-line that is actually used at trial,In the rush to use technology for everything, some
I'd be even richer if I had $100 for every one that waslawyers feel disadvantaged when their exhibits don't
overloaded with detail.have that glossy, computer-enhanced sheen. The key
Time-lines are supposed to give jurors a road mapisn't to focus on what everyone else is doing or to
and not a head-ache.always use the latest and greatest technology. The
To avoid ruining your time line with too muchanswer lies in using exhibits that transform that look of
information, remind yourself that an effective time lineconfusion to a look of, "OH. Now I see."
judiciously references only a few key events so jurorsThere is no shortage of examples where lawyers use
can look at it quickly and understand almost instantlynothing more than their bare hands, or paper and
what you are trying to establish. If a case spans manymagic markers, to bring home their point. I worked with
years and complex events, you might need more thana lawyer who during a mock trial, tested out a
one time line. Then, jurors can understand the keyhome-made exhibit that worked like a charm. He took
events and themes for each critical time period andcardboard boxes, wrapped them in brown paper,
you can use a different demonstrative that puts all theattached wires to them, and used them to show jurors
puzzle pieces together.the simplicity of electrical concepts. It looked like a 6th
There are exceptions to every rule and sometimes itgrade science project and it made all the difference in
does make sense to load up a time line with details,whether jurors were able to understand his client's
but only if those details help illustrate a particular point.case.
For example, before and after.The beauty of this exhibit was that it sent the very
- Before she complained of discrimination, she was lateimportant message to jurors that "this is NOT over
on 25 different days. Illustrating every date she's lateyour heads. You don't need to be fooled by hired-gun
helps show that she wasn't discriminated against. In thisexperts. A simple cardboard box is all you need." That
case, you would want your time line to look clutteredwas the perfect message in a case where plaintiff's
because the clutter is actually proof of an employee'svictory depended entirely on experts.
poor performance.In sum:
- Before Smith & Company wrote an internalThe rule for good exhibits is the same for any kind of
memo, complaining that the project wasn't profitable, itcommunication during trial: You always have to
had 50 employees on the job; after the memo wasremember who your audience is and give your
written there were only 10 employees on the job. Inaudience the tools they need to truly understand - not
this case, you'd want to visually depict the difference injust the facts, but the significance of those facts.
the number of employees in a way that goes beyondKeep in mind that winning one's case is often a
a mere bar chart. Why? Because 50 employees canseparate issue from having good trial exhibits. From
be visually depicted as players covering a field,my vantage point, I see two things all the time: First, too
showing depth and breadth versus a bar chart thatmuch money is spent on finished trial exhibits that
only illustrates a difference in height.aren't tested out until a mock trial weeks before the
When you use a time line to show underlying motivestrial date. The objective feedback from lay persons
(discrimination, retaliation, under-staffing the jobeither requires more costly changes or causes
because of lost profit), visually depicting quantifiablelawyers to discard finished exhibits altogether. Second,
details on a time line is incredibly effective. You cantoo many lawyers commit themselves to a particular
use easy visuals such as:exhibit without ever getting the objective feedback
- Little people to represent employees (people whothey need to differentiates the sea glass from the
look like "The Game of Life,")thousand grains of sand.
- Blue ribbons to represent awardsSo my advice to all practitioners who are trying to tell
- Stacks of dollar bills to represent lost profit (and lostthe right story with the right exhibits, test out your ideas
money should be stacked beneath the time line,early on and use that testing process to refine not only
otherwise it looks like a mountain of money, whichyour exhibits, but your case presentation as well. After
would send the wrong message.)all, exhibits are not only the nuts and bolts of your
Working with a professional can help you ensure thatcase, but they are the thematic blue print - giving jurors
your exhibit sends the right message. Too often,the big picture of what your case is really about.
lawyers hire professionals to depict every last detail. If