Global Consciousness - Should I Be a Skeptic?

Global consciousness, as an idea, has been debatedpossible physical causes such as sunspots or cell
widely and fiercely. The theory that an event affectingphone interference.
a large number of people creates a scientificallyRecently, I picked up on a podcast interview of Roger
measurable energy shift across the world sends manyNelson, a retired professor from Princeton University
skeptics into a frenzy. 'Pseudoscience,' they mutterwhere he answered these criticisms:
and dismiss it out of hand. Could group consciousness1) As to whether the researchers were merely seeing
be a genuine and measurable phenomenon? Thepatterns that don't really exist, Nelson and Radin point
origins of the science of measuring this phenomenaout that half of their predictions are published in
begin with the Global Consciousness Project.advance, and that the rest have clearly defined
The Global Consciousness Project, started byparameters. So, data mining doesn't seem to be a
Princeton University's Dr. Roger Nelson and Dr. Deanreasonable explanation.
Radin, has been running for more than 10 years. Nelson2) Regarding interference, they point out the great
and Radin attached small industrial-strength randomlengths they have gone through to prevent such
number generators to PCs and placed them at overcontamination of the data. Most importantly, they point
60 spots around the world. Next, they and set aboutout any such anomalies have not show up in the data.
monitoring them 24/7. These little boxes generate aFor example, they have compared data from
random series of 0s and 1s (200 every second) whichgenerators close to big cities with the data from rural
are recorded and analyzed. Under normal conditionsareas in order to see if cell phone interference was
the numbers produce a random pattern as one wouldinvolved - it wasn't.
expect.3) Finally, they point out that the ten years of data
However, researchers predicted that during an eventcollected is open to examination and analysis, and that
involving large groups of people, whether a positivewhile many skeptics have tried to find a smoking gun
one like a Live Aid concert, or a negative one like 9/11,of impropriety, none have succeeded.
a shift in our energy field would produce a measurableWith this solid bank of data, and extensive testing and
change in the pattern of the data collected by there-testing over the years, Nelson and Radin have
random number generators. This theory was based onconvincing proof of the existence of measurable
similar results they had seen in the Princetoneffects of group consciousness. The transparency of
Engineering Anomalies Research (PEAR) laboratory,their work, and their willingness to invite skeptics to
where they observed that certain people were able toperform their own analysis of their data is another
affect the output of similar random number generatorsargument in their favor. Several skeptics who have set
just by concentrating.out to disprove their theories have ended up becoming
Skeptics of the research have claimed the methodspart of their project, conducting their own research into
used in collecting and analyzing the data weren't up tothe data. All this seems to point to a strange, but
snuff. They claimed researchers were just looking forundeniable conclusion - we are all linked together in a
patterns after the fact, and that the data wasn'tglobal consciousness.
checked to make sure it hadn't been affected by