| It is no secret that Darwin's theory of evolution has | | | | science. |
| come under fire over the last few of decades. The | | | | Unfortunately, our textbooks still contain these |
| reason? Because the theory has been based on | | | | disproven 'facts' as if they were true although many of |
| 'facts' that are no longer backed up by science over | | | | the evolutionists are well aware of the problems with |
| the last few decades. | | | | the ideas. |
| Most of us have learned the theory of evolution via | | | | What are the implications of these charts and pictures |
| our universities and public schools. Very few realize | | | | in the textbooks? It simply means that our children are |
| that almost all of these ‘facts' that we learned | | | | learning information that is known to be wrong. |
| have been disproved over the last few decades. And | | | | Most of us have been educated with these ideas as |
| it has been scientists (not theologians) that have | | | | well. Although it is just a theory, it is often given as a |
| disproved the 'facts' that we have been told. | | | | fact or a law. When we are told something regarding |
| Whether we are discussing Darwin's Evolutionary | | | | the theory of evolution, it is most often based on |
| Tree, Evolution of the Horse, The human evolution | | | | hypothesis that evolution is real. |
| chart or the fossil record, every one of these have | | | | This seems logical because the teachers, professors |
| been proven not to support the theory of evolution | | | | and students have been taught that it is true. Any |
| literally decades ago. | | | | denial of the theory is not allowed in the discussion. |
| | | | | Scientific journals seem to be determined to keep any |
| As we observe the 'evolution of the horse' chart, we | | | | debate of the subject out, even by fellow evolutionists |
| find that the beginning of the 'ancestry' has had nothing | | | | if the evidence runs contrary to the theory. |
| to do with horses. Other factors make this chart | | | | But the evidence of science is 180 dgrees in opposition |
| unaccceptable, even by a large majority of | | | | to any kind of evolution. But you would never know |
| evolutionists. | | | | this by what we hear and read in journals and |
| The so called evolution tree has been discarded even | | | | textbooks. Only those that are willing to dig a little bit |
| by a majority of evolutionists. Many of the charts are | | | | below the surface (of textbooks, nature shows etc.) |
| in disagreement with eachother. Evolutionists cannot | | | | are discovering the vast amount evidence against |
| say what one kind of creature actually evolved from | | | | Darwinism. Fortunately, more and more students of the |
| (a major problem with the theory). | | | | subject are willing to do just that. |
| The 'human evolution chart' has ended up being a | | | | This leaves us with a very interesting question. |
| chart with just apes and then humans with nothing in | | | | If science does not back up the idea of evolution, then |
| between, if all of the mistakes, non-existent ape-men | | | | what category does it belong in? The only possible |
| and hoaxes are removed. | | | | one would be that of a philosophy or religion. And if |
| And scores of these 'facts' exist that is no longer in | | | | evolution is a religion, then is it possible that, just maybe, |
| support of evolution or at least based on faulty | | | | our children are being taught a state religion? |