The Modern Significance of Hawthorne's Suspicion of Science

Many of Hawthorne's characters are burdened byBeatrice. In his critical response to the stories, Madison
inner conflicts which are never resolved into a tidyJones observes: "Both women die as the
resolution. "The Birthmark", however, has a moreconsequence of attempts, devised by human science,
clearly defined moral than some of Hawthorne's otherto purge their natures". With both tales, Hawthorne
work. The social significance of this story that wassets human morality and science on a collision course
written over 150 years ago endures into our modernthat has not altered its path into the present day.
era with alarming clarity. An obsession with physical"Dr. Heidegger's Experiment" introduces a scientist who
perfection and the battle between scientific progressshares Aylmer's confidence that he can reverse
and human morality are paramount in the minds ofnatural processes with the same result: bad science
many in today's society. This article will explore twoputting others at risk. At first glance, Heidegger seems
primary points: first, it will focus on how "The Birthmark"more playful and less dangerous than Aylmer and
compares to some of Hawthorne's other work withRappaccini: "My dear old friends... I am desirous of your
similar themes; next, it will weave these themesassistance in one of those little experiments with which
together to show how his work explores these issuesI amuse myself in my study". But according to Madison
in haunting detail and could serve well as a mirror toJones, our response to his virtues does not make him
modern-day values.any less diabolical. Heidegger's attempt to manipulate
Hawthorne's mistrust of science is evident in the "madnature by granting eternal youth might be paralleled to
scientist" motif employed in many of his tales. In "Thetoday's issues of genetic engineering and cloning. Both
Birthmark", Aylmer is a megalomaniacal scientist whoare attempts to manipulate the natural order of things.
thinks himself omnipotent: "No king on his guardedThe dichotomy of Hawthorne's time and ours can be
throne could keep his life if I, in my private station,merged when we consider an issue such as cloning.
should deem that the welfare of millions justified me inDr. Bruce Donald of the Church of Scotland offers:
depriving him of it". In "Rappaccini's Daughter", Dr."Faced with such a fertile prospect, the human
Rappaccini is a "mad scientist" conducting experimentsimagination runs riot... we might clone humans to select
on his daughter which involve poisonous plants. And inout genetic defects or select for desirable traits
"Dr. Heidegger's Experiment", the protagonist(Donald). Some would argue that this is a good thing
experiments with a fountain of youth elixir on hisbut Donald contends that the motives proposed turn
friends. Although Heidegger's results aren't fatal, as inout to be for the benefit of the person who wants the
the other two stories, they are, indeed, dismal and arecloning done, not for the person so produced. This
no less subject to ethical criticism.sounds remarkably close to Dr. Heidegger's motives,
To put the theme of "The Birthmark" into a modernbecause we have evidence to support that he
perspective, we need only to reiterate that the pursuitcreated the elixir "for his own amusement" rather than
of physical perfection and the willingness to go to anychiefly for the benefit of his friends. With these three
lengths to get it is one of the grand themes oftales, Hawthorne extends his list of scientific
modern-day thinking. Georgianna's birthmarkgrievances.
symbolizes her liability to sin, sorrow, decay, and deathWhile these three stories offer immediate insight into
and she is willing to forego the danger involved tomodern concerns, other Hawthorne tales do the same
have it removed: "There is but one danger-that thisalthough they may not be quite so straightforward.
horrible stigma shall be left upon my cheek... Remove it,"Ethan Brand" presents another scientist whose pride
remove it, whatever be the cost". We need only recallleads him astray. In this story, Hawthorne creates a
the Phen-fen and Redux debacle of a few years agomodel of self-destructive perfectionism; Brand ruins
and reflect on the present "perfection" techniques nowhimself as surely as Aylmer kills Georgianna (Bunge
being widely used such as breast implants, liposuction,30-32). In "The Artist of the Beautiful" Owen tries to
and scores of other dubiously "safe" cosmetic surgerymake machinery look natural, but his art, like Aylmer's
procedures to see that the mindset of Aylmer andscience, is a hopeless attempt to evade reality. And
Georgianna is still quite relevant today. While it is true"The Prophetic Pictures" introduces us to a painter
that Georgianna did not appear to have an issue withwho thinks he can predict the future, and thus, control
her birthmark until Aylmer made it an issue, it must betime. He has a madness not unlike Aylmer's and with
stated that the influence of family and peers plays asimilar consequences. The modern significance of all
significant role in the way people think aboutthese stories can be tidily summed up with one
themselves and in their decision making. Let usobservation by Richard Harter Fogle: "Man's chief
compare the response of Georgianna to that of atemptation is to forget his limits and complexities..."
modern woman who is contemplating plastic surgery.Hawthorne's foresight into the future was quite
Author Kathy Davis takes us into the examining roomremarkable. Although his work is dated, the ethical
of a health insurance agency on the morning forquestions which he raises remain valid today.
applicants who are seeking coverage for cosmeticGeorgianna's absorption of Aylmer's obsession can be
surgery:likened to today's women jumping on the bandwagon
I have no idea what to expect as the patient entersof fad diets and questionable cosmetic procedures. On
the room. She is a slender, pretty woman in her earlyanother point, Hawthorne's suspicion of science seems
twenties who looks a bit like Nastassia Kinski... Huncheda little less unreasonable now that it might have in his
forward and with eyes cast downward, she begins today when we consider our capacity to destroy the
explain that she is "unhappy with what she has". "Iplanet with nuclear weapons. Fogle comments that
know I shouldn't [compare] myself to other women",while Hawthorne's conception of science has generally
she whispers, "but I just can't help it."been considered old-fashioned by his critics, the joke
The Aylmers of today are the plastic surgeons andwould seem to have turned against them with the
drug-peddling physicians who feed the unrealistic notiongrowth of modern science and technology. Aylmer,
that a woman's body is unacceptable unless it appearsRappaccini, and Heidegger all represent the claims of
to be a jackpot winner in the "genetic lottery". Despitemodern science, from the miracle diet pills, cosmetic
the changes in cultural beauty ideals over time, onesurgeries, and anti-aging creams and potions, to
feature remains constant according to Davis; namely,Minoxidil, to Viagra which allows the "soldier"on
that beauty is worth spending time, money, pain, andpermanent KP duty to finally issue a sharp military
perhaps even life itself. The hand-shaped birthmarksalute. Some of our "miracle" science appears to work,
which pervaded the world of Georgianna and Aylmerbut some has dire consequences.
also has an obsessive vice-like grip on our century-it isFinally, we have examined how Hawthorne's themes
squeezing the life out of some, and the humanity outform a common bond to modern-day practical and
of others. As H. Bruce Franklin points out, "Theethical questions. Hawthorne, himself, had an obsession
Birthmark" is both an intricately wrought science fictionwith his ancestral past, so it is ironic that he produced
and a commentary of what Hawthorne saw as thework that would prove to be a prelude to the future.
fiction of science.Hawthorne wants us to see that "human perfection" is
"Rappaccini's Daughter" is another tale which exploresan oxymoron. On this point, Fogle notes that Aylmer's
research gone amok as the doctor has created atragic flaw is failing to see the tragic flaw in humanity.
daughter who lives in a poisonous garden and isHawthorne's "mad scientists" cannot come to terms
poisonous herself. Like Aylmer, Rappaccini seeswith the fact that humanity and imperfection are
himself as God-like. This argument is advanced byinseparable. But still today, we are no less apt to buy
Franklin's interpretation of the basic allegory in the tale:into the rantings of our own mad scientists and snake
"Rappaccini, creator of the [poisonous Eden], in tryingoil salesmen on late night infomercials who infest our
to be God exposes his daughter, the Adam of thissociety and promise us perfection. Madison Jones
inverted Eden, to a modern snake in the grass, Baglioni,sums up the foresight of Hawthorne supremely: "Like
who persuades the Eve-like Giovanni to introduce themany a reformer in our day, Aylmer would have
fatal food into the learned fool's paradise". Rappaccini'shuman nature reconstituted or else not at all.
delusions of grandeur are apparent as he attempts toHawthorne, if unconsciously, was looking well ahead.
justify his experiment to his dying daughter: "Dost thouBut genius has always been at least one part
deem it misery to be endowed with marvellous gifts...prophecy". Hawthorne's moral makes a plea to us to
Misery to be able to quell the mightiest with a breath?accept our own imperfections. This moral can be
Misery, to be as terrible as thou art beautiful". This airexpressed through a quote from-of all people-David
of omnipotence is nowhere more evident than in theLetterman. In an interview that I remember from a few
physicians today whose life-prolonging machineryyears ago, Letterman was asked by an actress what
allows them to literally decide life and death. And we,he would change about his physical appearance if he
of course, cannot forget the good Dr. Kevorkian andcould. Letterman's reply was, "Well, I wouldn't change
the euthanasia issue which has turned into a battle ofanything. I figure, these are the cards I was dealt-what
rhetoric that theologians and scientists will probablythe hell- I'll play 'em". Hawthorne would have probably
never agree on. Aylmer and Rappaccini can best beliked Letterman.
likened by making a comparison of Georgianna and